I do not wish for my review to sound biased or one-sided, but I still enjoy this film all these years later. I saw the 2003 Hulk, and although it has one or two good moments, the desert scene imparticular, it fell short. Dry story and an overly exaggerated and neon Hulk. I've seen the Avengers, and Mark Ruffalo just does not capture the struggle of being Bruce in my opinion.
Here, our movie starts of with Ed Norton portraying the titular character in Brazil (picking up where the 2003 story left off). He poor, depressed about not being able to go home, maintaining a very low profile to avoid the public eye at all costs; I felt for this version of Bruce Banner. I did his best to stay calm, but when push came to shove and then pushed some more, Hulk pushed back!!! The creators of this film said they wanted their Hulk to have a giant, green linebacker look, and it works! Hulk is intimidating, powerful, above all angry, and I still get chills hearing him speak for the first time from the shadows.
I would have preferred for Ed Norton to continue this role, but alas, Hollywood. The story for the film is not overly complex. It runs like a long episode of the old tv show. Bruce is trying to stay away from the army, he slips up, and they go after him again. The movie is excellent by itself but definitely ties into the early days of the MCU. If you have never seen this film, I highly recommend it!
Lastly, love the steelbook comic book design. Check it out in the photos.
I purchased this because of the steelbook and digital copy. Sad that it came damaged and scratched... I’m debating about returning it now and repurchasing it again.
Love the movie! I’m a huge Marvel fan and despite the criticism I still love it.
I love this edition so real. See The Hulk Breaking the Wall. Even i have this blu-ray but i buy it because it's cheap. I must have it because blu-ray edition not so good in packaging
damaged case was unfortunate.
(Even though I'll try to be as spoiler alert as possible, chances are it might not be close enough, so consider this your warning. Also, my rating/review is solely based on the theatrical movie by itself, not a DVD release)
So today I saw what many has stated to be the proper return of Marvel's The Incredible Hulk to theatres. But could it erase the bad memories of Ang Lee's 2003 over drawn-out film?
It comes real close, but.....
First off, this is definitely an improvement to the 2003 version. It's story is more to the point and more exciting. Ed Norton does a fantastic job as Bruce Banner. In fact to say his performance was based more on Bill Bixby's than anything else would be an understatement. And as the Ross' this time around, Hurt and Tyler do just fine replacing Elliott and Connelly, making you even think they're basically the same people. So cast here, with Tim Roth as the baddie in tow, isn't a problem.
In fact, if you missed Lee's movie don't worry, an edited reworking of it (with the new actors of course) appears under the opening credits. But it pretty much starts off where Hulk 1 left off with Banner hiding out in Brazil while IM communicating with a scientist stateside concerning finding a cure. After a freak accident at his job at a soda-pop factory(?), he of course is found and let the Hulking begin! Along the way he returns stateside to find this doctor that he has been communicating with (his name is Samuel Sterns, does that ring a bell?) and an aging military man by the name of Blonsky who undergoes a similar process as Banner's, and becomes Hulk's only real competition, The Abomination. There, I think I said enough.
Overall, I as a Hulk fan, enjoyed this movie. But did I freak-out over it? No. While this film is fan-boy's dream with cast, character, and quote cameos all over it, it's main appeal, The Hulk himself, still has one big flaw: He Looks Fake. No matter what advances in CGI we have done in the past fifteen years Hollywood still can't re-create the human form believable enough. During long-shots he looks decent, but on close-ups he doesn't even look like he's on the same screen. This was very distracting at first, and by the time the movie's flying a thousand times a second, you either get used to it or think you're watching just an expensive cartoon. I should state at this point that this film as a whole draws more from the actual comic books than anything else. At times in the beginning, the 70's TV show is a big inspiration, but towards the end all I could think of was "this really is like the comic book". If that was a good thing or not I'm not sure.
In conclusion, The Incredible Hulk is a decent movie. It is better than the first film, but it won't be the next XMen or Spider-Man either. Put it a few notches above The Fantastic Four. I do feel it will be better on the small screen than the big one, and in maybe an extended version as well. Some might recall that Norton was very unhappy with the final cut of the film, and I can see why. It did look like scenes were missing (alot of them made the trailers, but not the movie?), and it's acting portion is what to me saved the flix in the first place. I saw it for free, glad I did see it, and will watch it again on disc, but suggest for you to wait for that third option. You'd probably like it even more than I did.
Disc cannot be used in the US.